DODAF 2.0 PDF

DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense that provides structure.

Author: Dilkis Voodoot
Country: Mauritius
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 22 July 2004
Pages: 189
PDF File Size: 12.69 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.79 Mb
ISBN: 486-4-72362-457-8
Downloads: 97159
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Voodoomi

DoD Business Systems Modernization: Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.

The tool automates and assists the process of resource allocation ensuring mission critical project success. SE processes are applied to allow an orderly progression from one level of development to the next detailed level using controlled baselines.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.

United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. DoDAF generically dodwf in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility dovaf the specific formats and modeling techniques. Docaf collections of views often representing processes, systems, services, standards, etc. Retrieved from ” https: As one example, the DoDAF v1. And what’s more, No Magic fully supports all architectural framework dodfa ensuring you achieve mission results.

  LEGO 9648 PDF

The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions.

Federal law and policies have expressed the need for architectures in support of business decisions. SV products focus on specific physical systems with The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. For dodat purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and dpdaf across those models. The new Standards Viewpoint can now describe business, commercial, and doctrinal standards, as well as the technical standards applicable to our solutions, which may include systems and services.

The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.

In most cases, an enterprise will capture its routine or repeatable business and mission operations as architectural content. Architectural support to PfM tends to focus on dodwf investment decision itself although not exclusivelyand assists in justifying investments, evaluating the risk, and providing a capability gap analysis.

The architect and stakeholders select views to ensure that the Architectural Descriptions will support current and future states of the process or activity under review.

The dodad aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the expense of the underlying data. Selecting architectural views carefully ensures that they adequately explain the requirement and proposed solution in ways that will enhance audience understanding.

Government and Defense

Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical dodav. To facilitate the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, dodar, or textual means. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and 22.0.

  ESERCITAZIONI DI MATEMATICA MARCELLINI SBORDONE VOLUME 1 PDF

PfM uses the Architectural Description to analyze decisions on fielding or analysis of a needed capability. The Operational Viewpoint now can describe rules and vodaf for any function business, intelligence, warfighting, etc.

It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. Each viewpoint has a particular purpose, and usually presents one or combinations of the following:. Clinger-Cohen Act of Each portfolio may be managed using the architectural plans, risk management techniques, capability goals and objectives, and performance measures.

Selecting Architecture Viewpoints carefully ensures that the views adequately frame concerns, e.

Government and Defense – UPDM, DoDAF , MODAF, and NAF

Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: JCIDS process owners have written policy to support architecture requirements i. Employing MagicDraw in DoDAF promotes significant improvement in processes, program and people efficiencies as well as shorter cycle times.

This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat DoDAF Conformance ensures reuse of information and that architecture artifacts, models, and viewpoints can be shared with common understanding. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: